Article Review Guideline

The review should address the following vital issues:

(1)    What is the major theme of the article?

(2)    Did the authors provide enough background information for the intended audience to understand it?

(3)    Do the researchers clearly develop a major research question, proposition, or hypothesis that is to be evaluated in the empirical study and discussed in this article?

(4)    What are the theories discussed in the paper and how do they compare?

(5)    Are the particulars in the research design and methods (e.g., research design, sampling techniques, data collections and analysis methods, and data validity and reliability) appropriately stated? Justify.

(6)    If the author argues supporting/rejecting a theory, what are her/his

reasons and how valid are the reasons?

(7)    In discussing the results of the empirical study, do the authors remain true to the actual findings of the study

(8)    How well are conclusions of the article aligned with the findings of the study?

(9)    What exactly does the work contribute and relate to the overall topic of your course?

(10) In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper?




Instructions

·            Chose two articles and review independently.

·            The page limit for the review is 2

pages (for each), written in Times New Roman 12, Line spacing 1.5, & paragraphs Justified

·            Your work should be neat and

clear.

·            Submission Date: Sunday, January 14, 2023

·            Any delay for submission will not

be accepted unless reasonable evidence is presented.

·            Academic dishonesty (plagiarism, cheating and etc) will make your value zero.


Comments